Accumulating Stuff vs. Serving Others

We very seldom view accumulating stuff as a barrier to serving others.  Common sense would seem to say that if you possess more stuff then you have more with which to serve others.  Jesus appeared to see this from a different perspective.   In Luke 12 Jesus tells a parable of a rich man whose  land is especially productive and has much more than he needs.  The rich man comes to a simple conclusion of what to do with this incredible blessing:

I will do this: I will tear down my barns and build larger ones, and there I will store all my grain and my goods. And I will say to my soul, Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry.

Jesus proceeds to tell His disciples (which hopefully includes you and me) that our lives should follow a radically different path rooted in living out His kingdom in the here and now.  Here’s Jesus’ radical conclusion of how that should look:

Sell your possessions, and give to the needy. Provide yourselves with moneybags that do not grow old, with a treasure in the heavens that does not fail, where no thief approaches and no moth destroys.  For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

I don’t want to get too preachy here, but as followers of Jesus a big part of our mission (our reason for existing on this earth) is to be a glimpse of Jesus’ coming kingdom.  Think of our life’s misson as being an appetizer for the amazing banquet that is to come (check out this parable too).  Jesus seems to repeatedly say that our desire to hold on to the stuff of this world creates a big barrier to us living out this mission…

Here’s a few thoughts on why:

The more stuff we have, the more we want more stuff. Consumerism is addictive.  Our natural tendency is to pursue the bigger, nicer, better, fancier ____________.

The more stuff we have, the more we want to hold on to our stuff.  Somehow our stuff  easily becomes the source of our security and satisfaction.  Our hearts have the capacity to turn almost anything into an idol.

The more stuff we have, the more our stuff becomes the desire of our hearts. We often think that wherever our heart is that our treasure  (money & resources) will follow.  Jesus says it’s the other way around.

The more stuff we have, the more of our time and energy it requires. Just check out our calendars.  A lot of time is spent keeping up our nice stuff rather than sacrificially serving others.

The more stuff we have, the more it insulates us from the needs of others. Everyone (both wealthy and poor) has needs, but all too often pursuing bigger better stuff removes us from intersecting with those in need. Does God  choose to bless some with larger houses, nicer cars, and more resources? Certainly.  Does God lead some Jesus-followers to reach out to the wealthy with the good news of Jesus? Of course…

BUT here’s the big bottom line:  If God blesses us with a lot of stuff , it’s so we can be a blessing to others and become a glimpse of His kingdom in the midst of a messed up world.

 

 

Footnote:

Although this 2002 Barna study is several years old and focused on tithing, I still find it interesting and somewhat relevant:

In general, the more money a person makes the less likely he/she is to tithe. While 8% of those making $20,000 or less gave at least 10% of their income to churches, that proportion dropped to 5% among those in the $20,000-$29,999 and $30,000-$39,999 categories; to 4% among those in the $40,000-$59,999 range, down to 2% for those in the $60,000-$74,999 niche; and to 1% for those making $75,000-$99,999. The level jumped a bit for those making $100,000 or more, as 5% of the most affluent group tithed in 1999.

 

 

Retribution vs. Reconciliation

For some reason this issue  (retribution vs. reconciliation) has been on my mind a lot lately.  Part of the reason is having a new baby.  There’s something about spending time with Jude and Wren that makes me think about things such as redemption and reconciliation.  In my family, and especially in my relationship with my own dad, I’ve struggled with the desire for retribution and the need for reconciliation.  Maybe it’s also partially influenced by the whole Osama Bin Laden thing.  I’ve found myself excited that he’s dead and he can no longer directly hurt people- as some have put it, “justice has been served.”  I’ve also found myself wondering if my excitement, thoughts, and feelings have somehow moved away from the arena of justice to vengeance (a.k.a. retribution).

One reason this should be a big deal to us is that reconciliation should be one of the defining values of a Jesus-follower.  The Apostle Paul writes that God through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation (2 Corinthians 5:18).  Although we may 100% embrace the idea that Jesus went to the cross for us, forgave us our sins, and gave us a restored relationship with God, we often struggle to practically live out that reconciliation right now in the real world.  Two examples stick out in my mind…

#1) Reconciliation in our families. I constantly hear about how the family is endangered in America due to issues such as the “culture wars,” the debate about gay marriage, or the growing depravity of the entertainment industry.  I personally think the greatest attack is not from outside but from within our families due to broken relationships.

Many of us have been impacted by divorce, whether as participants or victims.  We’ve seen husbands and wives exchange vows then break those vows.  I’ve personally heard Christians say that they are divorcing due to “irreconcilable differences.”  I’ve seen adult children refuse to speak to their parents due to mistakes from the past and vice versa.  Somehow we’ve grown to accept that love can turn into hatred.

This is not a distant struggle for me.  As an adult I watched my parents go through a divorce due to my father’s indiscretions that was finalized one month before my wedding.  Although I was extremely close to my Dad while growing up, we ended up going through two years of not speaking.  I had a choice to make: I could either make him pay for his mistakes for the rest of his life or seek reconciliation.

I think somewhere along the line God showed me that if I’m going to talk about being reconciled to our heavenly Father that I need to be reconciled to my earthly father.  I especially want my kids to understand what scriptural reconciliation is about- hopefully they’re seeing it right in front of them.

#2) Reconciliation with our enemies. I know that’s a pretty broad term, but when I use it you probably already have a picture of who that is from your perspective.  Usually, when we’re using the “us” and “them” terminology, your enemies would be the “them.”  Maybe it’s those nations or groups at war with America.  Maybe it’s the groups on the opposite side of the Christian culture wars.  For a Democrat it may be a Republican and to Republicans it’s the Democrats.

Here’s the big challenge: Jesus teaches us to love our enemies just as He tells us to love our neighbors.  Whether we consider someone (or a group of people) our neighbor or our enemy, Jesus challenges us to love them in the same manner.

I do not believe this means we should not seek justice nor stop those who are doing wrong from harming the innocent.  Unfortunately, we often cross the line of justice into the arena of vengeance and retribution.  Only when we place vengeance in God’s hands can we approach others with a spirit of reconciliation so that they may see the life of Jesus in us.  I realize this is a tough line to tow…

How do we really know if we’re driven by justice or vengeance?

What does it look like show forgiveness and offer reconciliation while not dismissing appropriate consequences?

I’d love to hear your feedback.

 

 

Bending the Vertical

A couple of weeks ago I received an email from David Medina, a good friend and church-planter in California.  In his email he shared the following:

I can genuinely say for the first time since we started, that numbers in that regard do not matter to our heart. It’s hard to explain, but I am so grateful to Jesus for being patient with us, and leading us to a place where we can be full of integrity in announcing to the world, and to our surrounding church co-laborers, that it is ALL about Jesus. We are whole-heartedly focused on our (as Piper says) our vertical relationship first, and then learning how to “bend” that vertical fruit of love out to all of our horizontal relationships.

For the past week and a half, these statements have been haunting me.  I cannot get them off of my mind.  Although as a Jesus-follower and pastor I wear the Jesus label, I have been forced to ask is it ALL really about Jesus?

What would my life and ministry look like if I focused on my vertical relationship first and then learned to bend that vertical fruit of love to all of my horizontal relationships?

Is the life I’m living, the family we’re growing, the relationships I’m building, and the ministry I’m starting all really about Jesus?

Am I trying to pray God into my agenda and my plans or am I faithfully responding to who He is and what He’s doing?

What if following God’s path leads to greater suffering and sacrifice than I anticipated- is Jesus worth that much to me?

Is everything in my horizontal life the overflow of a vibrant vertical love relationship with Jesus?

I desperately want the answer to be yes.   I want to be a the point where I can fully agree with what the Apostle Paul writes to the Philippians:

But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ. Indeed, I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith– that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, that by any means possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead.

I appreciate your prayers in this matter.

Please pray that I would consider everything a loss compared to knowing Jesus.

Please pray that my marriage to Christin, my relationships with Jude and Wren (our soon to be born daughter), my friendships, and my ministry would all be the byproduct of bending this vertical relationship with Jesus.

Please pray that I would never use Jesus as means to an end in doing ministry or serving others-I want it to be ALL about Jesus.

Please pray that others would see the life of Jesus in me, on the good days and especially during the difficult times.

Through the cross

Through the cross…

Jesus gives Himself as a ransom.

Jesus forgives our trespasses.

Jesus erases our debt.

Jesus liberates us from sin.

Jesus frees us from our futile ways.

Jesus reconciles us to God.

Jesus reconciles enmity between people.

Jesus reconciles all things on heaven and earth to Himself.

Jesus pays our penalty and removes our guilt.

Jesus appeases God’s wrath and justice.

Jesus upholds God’s righteousness.

Jesus secures our redemption for eternity.

Jesus models the ultimate denial of self.

Jesus displays God’s power for our salvation.

 

 

For the love of Christ controls us, because we have concluded this: that one has died for all, therefore all have died; and he died for all, that those who live might no longer live for themselves but for him who for their sake died and was raised.

2 Corinthians 5:14-15

Open Life/Setting Boundaries

Over the past few weeks in our Sunday morning Home Fellowship we’ve been looking at the early church in Acts 2 and how that impacts the way we “do church” now.  One of the defining characteristics of the early Jesus movement is they were committed to sharing their lives with each other- eating together, praying for each other, sacrificially serving one another.  SO a very counterintuitive, paradoxical principle came up in our discussion: to effectively open your life to others, you must also learn to effectively set boundaries. With seemingly limitless needs in the community, opportunities to serve, and potential relationships to invest in, this has proven a timely reminder.

I admit this principle sounds extremely contradictory, because isn’t creating boundaries the opposite of opening up and sharing your life? Not necessarily.  Let me put in another way.  To develop deep meaningful relationships with some people, you cannot possibly develop deep meaningful relationships with all people.  None of us have the time, energy, or relational capacity to do that.  Just take a look at Jesus.

As we read through the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John we can see that multitudes (literally thousands) of people would gather to watch and listen to Jesus.  We can also see that out of these multitudes Jesus had a band of 70-120 people he referred to as disciples with whom He had a more committed relationship. Jesus had a closer knit familial relationship with His twelve apostles and some other close friends such as Mary, Martha, and Lazarus.  Still even within that group, Jesus would often pull aside Peter, James, and John, who became His inner circle.  For some reason, Jesus made a deeper investment and had a qualitatively different relationship with those three guys.  Most importantly, Jesus made a habit of withdrawing from all these people to spend time with the Father.

In my own life I see this at work.  To say yes to personal time with God through the scriptures and prayer, I have to say no to other things- that’s creating a healthy boundary.  To say yes to spending time with my wife and son (and soon arriving daughter), I have to say no to spending time with other people.  To say yes to mentoring potential leaders, I cannot say yes to making that time for everyone.  To say yes to sacrificially serving some new friends God has placed in my life, I have to actually say no to other opportunities.  These are all healthy boundaries- not boundaries to limit God’s activity but to focus the time, energy, and resources He has entrusted to me.

 

Guilt, Justice, or Grace

This morning I was asked by a computer media class at the Community College of Vermont to be interviewed as a volunteer who serves with the COTS (Committee On Temporary Shelter) Day Station.  Basically on Wednesdays I take a group of guests from COTS to do volunteer work with other nonprofits in the community.  It’s a pretty cool opportunity since it’s given me a way to build credibility with the COTS staff, get to know the COTS guests, and make connections with leaders in the nonprofit sector (which is huge in Burlington).  The student interviewer asked me the expected questions about needs and issues in the community, how to best address the needs of homelessness, how others can be involved in making a difference, then she asked me the BIG QUESTION: what motivates you to serve?

It just so happens that is a question among other related questions that  I’ve been thinking and praying about over the past few weeks:  What motivates me to serve?  How is my motivation the same or different than others in my community?  How has my motivation changed over the years? It’s as if God had prepared me for this question.  So here’s the answer.

There have been seasons in my life where I’ve probably been motivated by guilt.  I just felt guilty if I did not do an occasional token act of service because that’s what good people do.  The problem with using guilt as motivation is once I feel like I’ve paid my debt, I’m done.  If I feel a little guilty, then a little bit of service will do the trick.  If I feel really really guilty, then it may take getting my hands a little dirtier and working longer and harder, but eventually the guilt will pass.

There was also a time when I thought justice was the most noble motivation.  Of course there are disenfranchised people with extreme needs who haven’t had a fair shake, and they deserve to be served.  Here’s the problem- eventually you’ll end up serving people who are experiencing the consequences of self-inflicted wounds.  You’ll meet the drug addict who also dealt drugs.  You’ll meet the homeless wanderer who walked out on his wife and kids.  The deeper you dig into someone’s life, the more reasons you may find not to serve them, because you may end up thinking they’re actually getting what they deserve.

I’ve discovered a much stronger foundation for serving others is rooted in this simple fact: I’ve been blessed much more than I deserve. I know God has poured His grace into my life despite the fact I do not deserve it.  I know there have been kind generous people throughout my life how have poured into me when I had nothing to offer in return.  Somehow I’ve realized that this blessing, this grace, provides a much deeper well to draw from than the motivations of guilt or justice could ever provide.  Hopefully as I serve people, I’m allowing that same blessing and grace to overflow into another life that needs it just as I do.

 

 

 

Characteristics of a Disciple

A few days I read this humorous and somewhat challenging post by Donald Miller discussing the real characteristics of Jesus’ disciples.  Here’s his list of eight:

1. You think Jesus wants to take over the government so you cut off a soldiers ear in order to get the fighting started. (The neo cons are definitely disciples!)

2. You keep pestering Jesus about who he will give more power to in heaven.

3. You have no theological training but own a small fishing business which somehow makes you qualified because you “get it.”

4. The Holy Spirit crashes into one of your mini sermons so everybody can speak different languages and outsiders think you’re drunk.

5. People ask you if you know Jesus and you freak out and say no and run away.

6. You hear they killed Jesus on a cross and you figure the whole thing was a wash and you got duped.

7. You choose other disciples by playing rock, paper scissors.

8. You teach bad theology and have to have somebody else come over and correct you.

Check out the entire post.

 

Another one down…

For the second time in two months I’ve heard news of a pastor/church planter having an extramarital affair.  In both cases the guys were well respected by their peers, seemed to have an excellent leadership team around them, were leading fast growing churches that were engaging large numbers of nonChristians, and cheated on their wives with their administrative assistants.  In some ways this makes me sad, in some ways mad, and in some ways fearful.

Sad because of the hurt and havoc that has been caused primarily in their families but also in their churches and communities.  I cannot imagine the pain they are experiencing, but I do know that I never want to be the source of such pain.  When I was a single youth minister in my twenties, my old friend Troy Lindsey would always tell me, “never sacrifice your marriage or family on the altar of ministry.”  Every week God reminds me of those words of wisdom.  The most important ministry I will ever have is to Christin, Jude, and our soon to be born daughter.

Mad because of the black eye their actions have given to their churches and more importantly to the cause of Jesus.  I realize that the message of Jesus will survive the mistakes of messed up messengers, but we all know that our character and actions give credibility to the message we share.  When we say “yes” to serving as pastors, teachers, or any type of spiritual leadership, we should understand the weight of the responsibility we are taking on.  James 3:1 says bluntly that “we who teach will be judged more strictly.”

Fearful because I know that I’m no better than either of these guys.  I know that I am just as temptable and to think otherwise is just stupid and prideful (see 1 Corinthians 10:12-13).  I need grace.  I need accountability.  I need your prayers.

I’m thankful for the spiritual speed bumps God has given me in my life, if I ever try to go down this path.  God has given me an accountability partner I talk to every other week.  God has also provided me with a group of ministry leaders to meet with every Wednesday morning.  At the same time, I remember Erwin McManus once saying, “If you’re not going to be honest and faithful to your wife who you’ve made a life-long covenant to, then you’re probably not going to be honest to the guys who are supposed to be holding you accountable.”   Fortunately, I have a wife who can eerily see right through me.

SO here are some ways you can pray for me…

*Pray that I will never substitute ministry success for finding my satisfaction in Jesus.

*Pray that I will never sacrifice my family on the altar of ministry.

*Pray that Christin and I will continue to grow closer to Jesus and each other every day.

*Pray that I will be honest and accountable to the men I meet with regularly.

*Pray that God will guard my eyes, mind, speech, and feet as I seek to follow Him.

*Pray that if I ever get another administrative assistant that it will either be a guy or a lady old enough to be my mom.

 

Toxic Gospel?

O.K. I’m sure if you read other Christian blogs, you are Rob Belled out by now.  The main reason I’m even doing a post concerning his book “Love Wins” is because some of you have asked my opinion and even offered me copies of the book.  Well,  I finally finished the book late Sunday night.  It has proven to be an interesting, challenging, and controversial read to say the least. One of my biggest surprises was realizing that I’ve “hijacked” Jesus’ story  and  shared a message that is “misguided, toxic, and ultimately subverts the spread of Jesus’ message.”   Who knew I was guilty of sharing a toxic form of Christianity?  Anyway, before I share anything else, though, I want to share a few disclaimers:

1) I am not a Bell hater who has been looking for the right opportunity to slam him.  Actually the opposite is true.  In 2003 I heard Bell speak at a Youth Specialties conference and was an instant fan.  Since then, I’ve used and recommended his Nooma video series and followed his ministry.  At least a couple of times I’ve heard rumblings from academia that he plays loose with historic facts, but I’ve generally liked his creativity, the questions he’s asked, and the way he’s challenged my assumptions.

2) I’m 100% committed to Christian unity. Anyone who’s knows me or has served with me already knows that I’m all about bringing churches and ministries together across denominational lines for the sake of serving the community, sharing the gospel, and impacting the world.  This unity, though, is often rooted in a common commitment to the exclusivity of Jesus, the essentials of scripture, and God’s mission to this world.

3) This post is just my opinion. Many of you are reading this blog because for some crazy reason my opinion matters to you.  Others of you wish I’d keep my opinion to myself.  Either way, although I’ve endorsed Bell to some of you in the past and shown a clear commitment to unity, this time my opinion may prove to be divisive.  Realistically, unity in the church is dependent on a commitment commitment to Jesus and a shared set of beliefs and values.  Sometimes those beliefs unify us and sometimes they divide us.

4) Bell asks important questions. He asks the questions that cynics, seekers, and especially disenchanted young evangelicals are already asking: Has God created billions of people over thousands of years only to select a few to go to heaven and everyone else to suffer forever in hell? Is this acceptable to God? How is this “good news”? He’s not only addressing the questions being asked, but  he’s also exposing a growing fault line dividing young evangelicals between more theologically liberal and more theologically conservative camps.  Even if I disagree with his conclusions, this book is forcing evangelical leaders to communicate what they believe and address foundational themes of the gospel.  As I stated in an earlier post, one of the main reasons I’ve been concerned about the book is that I’ve left some big blanks for Bell to fill in concerning eternity, hell, and God’s wrath.

5) This book is not about a conversation. Bell has repeatedly said in interviews that through this book he’s simply entering the conversation in the wide stream of Orthodox Christianity.  Yet in the preface Bell makes it clear that he’s written this book because “Jesus’ story has been hijacked” and that those who believe in the traditional view of hell share a message which is “misguided, toxic, and ultimately subverts the spread of Jesus’ message.”  Now for any of you married guys out there, imagine sitting down with your wife, telling her you want to simply have a conversation with her, and beginning this conversation with terms like hijacked, misguided, toxic, and subversive.  How long do you think that would stay a conversation?  Obviously, others have taken the bait and entered the type of conversation we often refer to as an argument.  I know it will probably never happen, but I’d love to see a roundtable discussion with Bell, N.T. Wright, Tim Keller, and John Piper addressing these issues.

Now that I’ve made the disclaimers, I have to say a lot disappoints me about this book.  He plays loose with historical facts, and he’s even worse with the scriptures.  I don’t want to give a page by page breakdown but two great posts on these subjects are on blogs by  Kevin DeYoung and The Aquila Report.


SO WHAT’S SO TOXIC ABOUT THE TRADITIONAL GOSPEL MESSAGE?

1) An eternal hell vs. temporal hell. Bell has traded in the traditional view of an eternal hell and redefined it as time of pruning… an intense experience of correction… for a particular period of time (pp. 91-92).  At the heart of this perspective is the belief that given enough time, everybody will turn to God and find themselves in the joy and peace of God’s presence.  The love of God will melt every hard heart, and even the most “depraved sinners” will give up their resistance to and turn to God (p. 107).

He makes a pretty good point that the Greek word aion which is translated as eternal or everlasting can also refer to “a period of time.”  He uses this to make a point that hell could have an end to it.  The problem is that the same Greek word is used for eternal life in the positive sense (like heaven).  So if you apply the same logic to both, what does that mean for eternal life?  Either way, according to Bell, the Bible leaves space for some type of post-mortem repentance and redemption.  If Bell were correct, that’s a HUGE part of the good news for the Bible to leave out.

2) A God of wrath (or judgement) vs. God of love. One of my biggest disappointments is how Bell essentially says you have an either/or proposition when it comes to God’s love and God’s wrath.  Bell heavily implies that either He’s a loving God or a wrathful God, but He could not possibly be both:

Is God our friend, our provider our protector–or is God the kind of judge who may in the end declare that we deserve to spend forever separated from our Father? (p. 102)

If your God is loving one second and cruel the next, if your God will punish people for all of eternity for sins committed in a few short years, no amount of clever marketing or compelling language or good music or great coffee will be able to disguise that one true, glaring, untenable, unacceptable, awful reality. (p. 175)

Well I have a couple of problems with his line of thinking

  1. Pretending as if God does not have a wrathful side is not being honest about the story we see in scripture.  Anyone beginning in Genesis will quickly come to the story of Noah and the flood.  Fast forward to the last book of the Bible, and in Revelation 19 we see Jesus on a white horse and a sword coming out of his mouth.  He’s about to open the can.   Even in the famously quoted John 3 we see the two working together.  What do you think happens if you tell a cynic, seeker, or struggling Christian that God does not have a wrathful side, and they read one of these sections of scripture? Either they question your credibility or the credibility of scripture.
  2. Pretending that we have to choose between God’s love and God’s wrath denies that the two often work hand in hand.  It’s not as if God is scizophrenic and switching back and forth between His loving and wrathful personalities.  Even as humans we can understand how love can move us towards wrath. Exhibit A: I’m only 5ft 8 but if you mess with my wife or kid, you will encounter some serious wrath- because I love them.  In the above mentioned scriptures we see a God who loves, a God who is grieved, a God who is moved by justice, and a God who punishes- all the same God.

3) An exclusive gospel vs. an inclusive gospel. Bell states, There is exclusivity… there is inclusivity… Then there is exclusivity on the other side of inclusivity.  This kind insists that Jesus is hte way, but holds tightly to the assumption that the all-embracing, saving love of this particular Jesus the Christ will of course include all sorts of unexpected people from across the cultural spectrum.  As soon as the door is opened to Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, and Baptists from Cleveland, many Christians become very uneasy, saying that Jesus doesn’t matter anymore, the cross is irrelevant, it doesn’t matter what you believe, and so forth… What Jesus does is declare that he, and he alone, is saving everybody. Yes he means everybody- he is saying he believes everyone makes it.

Of course he does not address Jesus’ parables that seem to point to some level of exclusivity or a myriad of other scriptures:

wheat & the weeds- Matthew 13:24-30, 36-43
the wedding feast- Matthew 22:1-14
ten virgins- Matthew 25:1-13
talents & faithful servants- Matthew 25:14-30
separating goats & sheep- Matthew 25:31-46
ready servants- Luke 12:35-48
rich man & Lazarus- Luke 16:19-31


CLOSING CONCERNS

As I read “Love Wins” I could not help but think that many of the “toxic” aspects of the “traditional” gospel message happen to be the parts that our Western middle-class culture finds offensive.  The problem is that the gospel will offend every culture in some way yet different ways.  Cultures actually exist where an all inclusive and a wrath free God could prove to be equally toxic.  Although I’m 100% sold on cultural relevance and cultural sensitivity, if we begin removing the offenses of the gospel, what we have is an anemic version of the real thing.

I believe one the dangers with many of the similar modern theologies and spiritual theories is that they are being tested in blogosphere, the publishers house, on the stage, occasionally in the class room, but rarely on the battlefield of real ministry and spiritual warfare.  Jesus taught his disciples in the midst of doing ministry in the dangerous mess of this world- the arena where true testing is done.  In the Western world, we’ve achieved a relatively comfortable, persecution free existence, and if we’re not careful we’ll begin to believe that is exactly what we deserve.

On a very pragmatic level, I wonder what Bell thinks about the way the gospel is exploding in areas like China, Latin America, and sub-Saharan Africa.  I wonder what he thinks about movements of the past including the Great Awakenings of early America and the great revival in South Korea this past century.  The “toxic” gospel being proclaimed throughout these movements has included God’s love and God’s wrath, a literal heaven and a literal eternal hell, an exclusive Savior, and central to it all has been a blood soaked cross.   Shouldn’t someone get on a plane and fly to China or Nigeria or Peru and stop this before it’s too late, before they’re all infected with this toxic message?  Or could it be their turn to send messengers this way to remind of us of an eternal message that may not taste so good to the middle-class American palate?

 

Other blogs worth checking out on this:

 

Hell, Rob Bell… and me

Even living in Burlington, VT, I cannot escape the great debate in the blogosphere concerning Rob Bell’s new book Love Wins. I’m doing my best to reserve any judgement on the book until I have opportunity to read it, but I have to admit that his promo video…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODUvw2McL8g

and his publisher’s synopsis

Now, in Love Wins: Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived, Bell addresses one of the most controversial issues of faith—the afterlife—arguing that a loving God would never sentence human souls to eternal suffering.

do concern me a little. The big question I’ve been wrestling with since getting these brief previews of the book is why does it bother me so much? Realistically, he’s not addressing new questions that have not been debated in previous generations.  He’s not asking questions that I have not struggled with in my own faith journey.  I’m not worried about this book shaking the foundations of my faith.  So again, why am I bothered?

My initial compulsion is to open fire on Rob Bell because I believe he tends to muddy the theological waters quite a bit rather than bring clarity to controversial issues. Realistically, though, he is answering the questions that both seekers and cynics are asking.  I may in the end disagree with his conclusions regarding hell, eternal suffering, and the wrath of God.  But the real reason I am bothered, though, is that the questions he’s asking and the conclusions he’s reaching bring to light that I have not addressed these topics sufficiently as either a Jesus-follower or pastor.  I recently realized that during the six year period of planting a church and pastoring in NJ, I explicitly taught on these challenging topics in passing only a few times.  If anything, in my desire to make the gospel more palatable, I’ve left some pretty big blanks for Rob to fill in.  I’m bothered because I realize I’ve often left out a significant part of the beauty of the gospel.

As I’ve been reflecting and wrestling with this issue, I listend to past podcast (dated 1/28/10) from Tim Keller yesterday evening.  He closes his sermon on Hell with this statement:

You do not know how much Jesus loves you unless you know how much he suffered. What did he suffer on the cross? I think of David Martyn Lloyd-Jones’ sermon illustration that has helped me for years. He said I should imagine that a friend comes to see me and says, “Hey, I was at your house the other day and a bill came due. You weren’t there, so I paid it.” How should I respond? The answer is I have no idea how to respond until I know how big the bill was. Was it just a postage charge? Twenty cents or so? If so, you would say, “Thank you.”But what if it was ten years of back taxes? What if it was an enormous debt? As Lloyd-Jones says, “Until I know how much he paid, I don’t know whether to shake his hand or fall down on the ground and kiss his feet.” This is why I believe that hell is crucial for knowing the love of God.

If you’d like to read more, Tim Keller has a few articles on hell which I’ve found insightful and challenging:

http://www.redeemer.com/news_and_events/articles/the_importance_of_hell.html

http://www3.dbu.edu/jeanhumphreys/deathdying/preachinghell.htm

http://download.christianitytoday.com/pt/sermons/transcript/PT772.pdf